Tech
Most system design interviews focus on diagrams. Real systems fail because of trade-offs.
I've noticed that many system design discussions (and even interviews) spend a lot of time drawing boxes and arrows, but very little time discussing the trade-offs behind architectural decisions.
For example:
Should you optimize for consistency or availability?
When is a monolith actually a better choice than microservices?
Is event-driven architecture worth the added complexity?
How much latency is acceptable if it improves scalability?
When should caching be avoided instead of ...
Read the full discussion on Dev.to
This article was aggregated from Dev.to. Click to join the conversation.
View on Dev.to