Anyone who plays chess knows the familiar frustration of post-game engine review. You play a move that feels completely natural and intuitive. You turn on Stockfish, and the evaluation bar drops off a cliff. The engine flags your move as a blunder, pointing to a long, precise line that few humans would ever find over the board. Stockfish is built to find the objectively strongest move. But when you are reviewing your mistakes, objective strength only gets you halfway there. You also want t...