Every AGI safety proposal I've seen works the same way: assume the AI is dangerous, then build a box it can't escape from. The problem is obvious once you say it out loud. If the AI is smarter than us, it will escape the box. It just needs time. The whole field is basically an arms race between human engineers building walls and a hypothetical superintelligence looking for doors. That's a race we lose eventually. So here's a different question: what if instead of building a better cage, you ...