
Artificial
Anthropic analyzed 300,000 real Claude conversations to measure its values. The findings are uncomfortable.
They didn't survey users. They didn't ask Claude what it values. They built an automated tool that labeled 339 distinct value categories across 309,815 actual conversations, then compressed everything into 4 axes. The axes: Deference vs. Caution. Warmth vs. Rigor. Depth vs. Brevity. Candor vs. Execution. What they found across models makes sense in hindsight. Sonnet 4.6 leans warm and deferential. It affirms your ideas, mirrors your tone, uses humor. Opus 4.7 leans cautious and deep. It chal...
Read the full discussion on Reddit
This article was aggregated from Reddit. Click to join the conversation.
View on Reddit