Artificial
What has crypto actually proven if the agent also supplied the premises?
(disclosure: i maintain the open-source project this came up in. link at the end. the question stands on its own.) we hit a trust-boundary problem while building a deterministic authorization layer for agents, and i think it generalizes. an engine can strongly protect its verdict: signed authorization intent binding state-hash binding replay protection trusted evaluation time all solid. but if the same compromised agent runtime can influence both the proposed action AND som...
Read the full discussion on Reddit
This article was aggregated from Reddit. Click to join the conversation.
View on Reddit