I built a 36-pattern checklist to catch AI writing tells in my own drafts, calibrated against everything I've published. So when a theory about why AI can't write well went semi-viral last week, I read it the way I read a bug report: I wanted to know if the explanation actually matched the failure I was seeing in my own tool's flagged patterns, or if it just sounded right. One of the theories didn't match. It's wrong, and it's the kind of wrong that spreads because it sounds technical enoug...