The question I’m asking myself is whether open-source LLMs are now “ just good enough ” to meet 95% of requirements. I know, of course, that they still need to and will get even better, but where does the added value of the remaining 5% come from? a) Better answer quality? Okay, but does that justify the extra cost? b) Cleaner automated loops? Do the extra costs justify the effort of manual interventions to produce the same or similar quality? c) Reduced risk of facing internal/external ...